data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8389/d83892ee964151c47360fb313baed1b4b3f65a67" alt=""
Tonight I am going to talk about simple dark and light patterns underlying paintings. Often an artist will build a composition on a big simple light shape laid over a big simple dark, or the reverse of that. I have reduced a few paintings (albeit crudely, this blog is homemade) to show this idea. Above is an Emile Gruppe of Waterville, Vermont. This scene is incidentally still there pretty much unchanged
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5080d/5080d625c0776488eca60bb8a39d4575bac27dd2" alt=""
Here is the same scene with the darks exaggerated. Sometimes if you squint hard enough you can see a scene do this outside. However, usually the artist chooses to join up his darks into this kind if a simple pattern.
Below is a Brangwyn and below that I have simplified and exaggerated the darks to show the large dark shape that is laid onto a white field. This painting shows a lot of oriental influence. The big abstract shape is the subject of the painting more than a boat and some guys standing around in tubular pants. Brangwyn has "bent" the scene into an ornate cutout against a bright background. It is like an incredibly ornate paper doll silhouette cut out and placed on a white sheet of paper. This works particularly well in snow paintings and seascapes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/025c4/025c46948a0691ce51807a383caf2d99fabc80e6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7bd7/b7bd7b219822091bf097c85455b2ba5686ecea46" alt=""
Here is our Mulhaupt again.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8dd9/b8dd938cda3f717efc9f0aee9880b30de1fc0803" alt=""
And below is the exaggerated version.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e3a6/6e3a605c79f3fe1344ff29140a51e6a76a426b01" alt=""
Notice that most of those darks are hooked up into a large decorative pattern. The artist did this deliberately, it is a treatment applied to the scene in nature before him.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3fcdd/3fcdd0558c92ad85cafc6b9da7703269c0d063cd" alt=""
Here is a Rubens. Below I have grayed out everything except the two struggling women. They are keyed above everything behind them and linked together to form a large writhing progesterone dripping, femininity pinwheel.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1baf5/1baf50f5326f2b3d15ea7e6f7c0352f1c49563b4" alt=""
Incidentally, in my opinion, this was not done with a camera obscura. David Hockneys' theory fails in front of a painting so obviously constructed as this one.
5 comments:
Good job, Stape.
(If you squint at the exaggerated Brangwyn, there's a beautifully-constructed abstract.)
Love the Rubens. I agree; no camera obscura there.
I don't work much with "dark massing" but one of these days I've got to give it a try. Certainly make a landscape interesting.
DJ
All paintings are abstracts, some better than others, Some also have subject matter.
...............Stape
Marian;
It can be done with objects in the studio too.
.................Stape
All paintings are abstracts, some better than others, Some also have subject matter.
I loved this quote. I had to share it on facebook(with proper credit given, of course)
When you're right, you're right. And you are right.
Post a Comment