Monday, December 10, 2012

Simplified designs in iconic paintings

Winslow Homer, Fog Warning   The Museum of Fine Arts Boston
I write often about design. Design is what I call that part of  painting which is neither color or drawing. I prefer the word "design" to the word "composition" because it implies deliberate  and thoughtful human action.

YOU MAY CROP TO, OR FIND A COMPOSITION, BUT YOU MUST  ARRANGE TO DESIGN!

 I have been playing with some images in my Photoshop program that divides everything into either a black or a white pixel. Looking at paintings that way is rather like squinting at them, which is something I routinely do. Like squinting it eliminates all the detail and reduces them to their basic value structure. Simplification is the root of design. There is a concept in Japanese art called notan
 ( I will smugly let you assume I know my way around Japanese art). Arthur Wesley Dow 1857 –1922 who was from Ipswich, Massachusetts wrote an influential book published in 1912. In it he discusses Notan. That is the use of  simplified arrangement of the dark and light in an image. The book is a classic text on the subject of design in painting.




  Below is Winslow Homers painting above reduced down to only two values.









Not all   fine paintings are as reduced as these but I think many iconic paintings are. They have a big and very spare design. Like the ability  of great orators to succinctly say something with a few words that stays on your mind, these paintings make a bold and unforgettable statement without many complicated and busy shapes. Brevity  is  eloquent. The Homer has a  big dark of a somewhat bizarre shape (the pointed shapes of those clouds is so strange!) accented by a slash of light, the fish.  The clouds look eerie as befits a dangerous development in the weather for the Gloucesterman in the small boat. Those spiky shapes say threat. Homer has played the lights and darks in the water close enough together that it remains one big shape. Had he pushed the lights and the darks there further apart he would have destroyed the unity in the big shape of the water. The sea remains a single shape decorated with variation rather than a  collection of different and separate shapes. Subordinating value changes within an area preserves the large shapes and yet still allows for the variations necessary to convey the drawing.


Here is a favorite Rembrandt of mine, A Woman Bathing, from the National Gallery in London. This is likely Hendrickje Stoffels his housekeeper who became Rembrandts lover and common law wife. That was a scandal that sorely affected his standing in Amsterdam.
Below is  the reduced version.


It is a big, somewhat complicated, but single light shape against a dark field. Not much question as to where we are supposed to look and what the subject is here. There is enormous bulk and solidity in this figure. It has weight and mass. The picture also has the earthy humanity for which  Rembrandt is famous. The impossibly rich darks contrast brilliantly with smash of light on the simple gown she raises to a nearly indecent height. Only the shadow of its hem hides her underneathies from our prurient gaze.



Here is Bougereau's Nymphs and Satyrs belonging to the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute in Williamsburg, Massachusetts.  I understand this is now on loan to the Metropolitan in New York. I have always felt they had a weaker Bougereau than was fitting given the superlative quality of their collection and their place as the premier American museum.





This painting reduces down to a diagonally placed oval anchored at one end by the  female wonderful figure that counterbalances the struggling satyr.This oval is an intricate rhythmic collection of shapes silhouetted against the darkness of it's background Evidently, according to myth Satyrs fear water.



Above is a Dean Cornwell, a great American illustrator, and  below is it's reduced version.



This design is a loop of intricate shapes, dark against a light background. Notice that each of these shapes is totally different from each other. That gives it the maximum visual interest, as opposed  to  repetitive quickly read too similar forms. All of those darks are  linked by  the way. You can  place your finger on it anywhere and trace its entire circumference without lifting your exploring digit. If you divide the picture at the center the weight of the two halves balances. The largest most bizarre  and alluring dark shapes surround the man in the chair at the middle left, as he is the main actor in this drama and Cornwell wanted to make sure you knew that.


 © The Estate of Edward Seago, courtesy of Portland Gallery 
Here is Edward Seago again, a superb designer. This thing could be a  Franz Kline it is so abstract.This is a powerful and arresting design, brutal and like the harsh world of the arctic  where it was painted. The bold and aggressive design carries the story as much as the rendering of the objects.There must be only about three different values in this painting. This thing is boiled down to it's essentials also.




Again, all of the darks are linked. Notice the white negative spaces, they  are each different in area, giving maximum variety to their shapes.






Here is The Hundred Guilder Print by Rembrandt You can squint at this and see it's simple arrangement also. It is really a big dark field with a pointed wedge of light extended into it. Within that doorstop shape is a triangle at whose apex is the figure of Christ.



Here is an early 20th century etching by Edward Blashfield (1848-1936)  an English artist. The Breaking up of the Agamemnon. This is an example of the use of bold shapes in design. There was a great revival of etching in that era and in the better works of that day were great examples of design. I have studied them to learn their moves. I guess I should do a post on etchings of that period. Perhaps I already have, I forget, I have written so much.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have scheduled another Snowcamp, a winter painting workshop in the White Mountains of New Hampshire . Held at a rambling late 19th century inn.  The Sunset Hill in Franconia, New Hampshire which is very romantic and old timey.The workshop will be held January 26 through 28.  I have done this for a few years now and it is my favorite workshop of the year. The inn is the perfect place to do a class and the scenery is fabulous. The White mountains are spread before the inn like a movie set. 

 

It might be cold but the inn is right at our backs as we work so we can run inside by the fire and drink more coffee if it becomes too much. The inn has helped me do workshops for years now. They even provide us with our own dining room, where we can eat together around a big round table every night.  I do a talk  on art and design while our dinner is prepared by the inn's chef. If you are interested, please click here.


22 comments:

j.p. said...

Thanks Stape, great post on an ever-important subject. Your blog has been, and continues to be, a cornucopia of interesting and useful information for people like me who'd like to make a living by making pictures. And man, would I sign up for Snow Camp if I lived a bit nearer. I'll have to make do with independent snow painting excursions here in Finland. Anyway, keep on rocking!

Deborah Elmquist said...

I wait patiently for each of your posts and the jewels of wisdom you share so deftly. The masters of the past seemed to understand value suppression as part of creating designs that have made them icons. Can't wait for future posts on this subject.

Clem Robins said...

this post is wicked good. i linked it on FB, so now the two or three people who follow me will have a chance to become #31,764 and 31,765 and maybe even 31,766 of your followers.

Clem Robins said...

by the way, on that same FB page, i did a post last night on how i disguise computer lettering to make it resemble hand lettering. you might find it interesting.

Simone said...

Good point about the difference between composition and design. Seems like there is more "art" in design than composition.

The concept of notan illustrated in these great paintings conveys the genius of simplicity which these great artists commanded. It's a visual version of the saying, "Brevity is the soul of wit".

Paul Birnbaum said...

For more "purience" in the Rembrandt - that weird cushion-ey red thing behind the bather has a bit of a Georgia O'Keefe look to it (if you know what I mean) - or is it just my warped mind?

Steve Kohr Fine Art said...

Great to be reminded about the dark/light shapes....I now need to go re-evaluate some of my paintings, lol! I too wish I lived closer, Snowcamp sounds like a great event!

Steve

Doug Hoppes Studio said...

Awesome post! Just signed up for the snow camp!

Stapleton Kearns said...

jp., How far away can it be? Maybe I will do Snowcamp in Finland some day. That would be fun. Does any one there besides you speak English, my Finnish is pretty rusty.
........Stape

Stapleton Kearns said...

Deborah,
Thanks. I try to be useful.
.......Stape

Stapleton Kearns said...

Thanks Clem! I am reading the articles you linked for me.
........Stape

Stapleton Kearns said...

Simone;
I think there is more art in design. Hope you are well. I just might visit Florida this year.
............Stape

Stapleton Kearns said...

Paul, I don;t know what that cushiony thing is either.Maybe it is Georgia herself reproduced as a plush covered bobble head.
....Stape

Stapleton Kearns said...

Steve;
If you lived closer I would be happy to have you,Not many people live in New Hampshire anyway.
...........Stape

Stapleton Kearns said...

Doug, Thanks for signing up. I look forward to meeting you in the White Mountains. Better dress warmly.
..............Stape

MCGuilmet said...

Turning Japanese I think I'm turning Japanese I really think so.

Lori said...

Stape, squinted at my paintings while reading this post... Several, in progress are lined up in the den right now. I can see that I need to spend more time on design. I'll think in terms of connecting the darks first.

I use Photoshop, so I'll try reducing my paintings to 2values and see what emerges.

Thanks for taking the time to find and describe/phtoshop the images.

DGehman said...

What everyone else says... plus, thanks to Wikipedia, a pleasant portfolio of Dow's work: http://www.spanierman.com/Online-Exhibitions/Zulma-Parker-Steele-and-Arthur-Wesley-Dow/Check/top/Checklist

Many composi... er, designs that to my unpracticed eye seem to embody notan-ish approaches.

jackebel said...

Karen Wells did something similar with all of Vermeer's paintings. She reduced them to three values High, Low, and Mid-tone. She found in every case one value was at least fifty percent of the painting. The remaining two values were never equal. It may break down to 60-30-10, 50-45-5, etc. Vermeer was a master of light (value). I thought it was an excellent way to check the values in your paintings, and keep them in balance. I always enjoy your posts Stape. Thanks,
John Ebel

Clem Robins said...

can i send you an email, Stape? i did a painting last week in which i think i absorbed some of what you taught in your september posting, about diagonal recession. nobody likes the picture except me.

Robert P. Britton, Jr. said...

Wonderful post, Monsieur Kearns!

I also just wanted to say Happy Holidays and a special thank you. Thank you for all that you've done to share, inspire, and "download" your knowledge to others. Your generosity through the gift of knowledge is so very much appreciated!

May God continue to bless you in 2013 and bring you success and joy, to you and your family!

Peter Yesis said...

Thank you for all the wisdom, insight and great art showcased on your blog. I have learned so much and enjoyed even more.
Here's to a great new year ahead of us.