I want to show you a couple of great tree painters so that you can look at the restrained and simplified way each of them approached the sky hole problem. The painting above is by John Constable, courtesy of the artrenewal.org. Look at how "big" he kept the shapes in those trees. The sky holes are kept to a minimum and the large forms are dominant over them.When you see it done, it seems no big deal, but when you are confronted in nature by a tree with dozens of holes in it, some hard decisions have to be made.
The next painting is a Corot, look how few sky holes he used, just a handful, and they are carefully placed to both look random and to reveal the shape of the tree. Notice how airy those trees are, their wispy handling makes them look ephemeral. Their beauty is in their delicacy.
Here is more delicacy., this John Carlson is full of soft passages and artfully arranged shapes. The top third of this painting is an arrangement of unique and interesting shapes. These were designed carefully to be both random looking and to carry a concealed rhythmic geometry. Notice how differently each of these painters has handled the similar problems in their paintings.
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
17 comments:
Thanks! very helpful
Thanks, I am learning a lot.
The Constable painting was an important one for me years ago when I first started trying to figure out how to paint trees. He could give a wonderfully romantic and monumental feeling to trees while remaining faithfully naturalistic. And the Corot painting is very lovely.
We can't just repeat the successes of the old painters but boy can one learn a LOT about painting by studying how they made their best works. Thanks for posting these and the excellent commentary .
Thanks again Stapleton, for an eye opening post. I rather like the way Corot and Carlson handled the trees and sky holes over the method that Constable used. As beautiful as it is, I don't feel invited into his painting. Does the softness of the other two allow one to feel more welcome?
Keep on keeping on!!
barbara b.
This is just a wonderful instructional series.
Thank You
Thanks for the the focus on trees.
This post helps to define what we
can do to show 'em we know 'em.
( Didn't everybody drop out of
school in the 60s & 70s, it was the thing to do at that time.)
Thanks, I just realized I use too many holes.
Me Too Jeremy! I see now that I use WAY too many holes.
Coral may:
Thanks, lovely name!
.................Stape
Honor:
Thanks again, another lovely name!
......Stape
Philip:
Constable was also the hero of my youth.
Still love his stuff.
........Stase
Barbara:
The Constable is my favorite. I am guessing that because it is the oldest of the pictures it is harder to appreciate for a modern audience.
...............Stape
Maria:
Thank you.
.........Stape
Jeremy:
I do too, The pieces I posted though are exceptional in their sparing use of sky holes.
...........Stape
Bill:
Dropping out was going around in those days. More trees tonight.
...........Stape
Mary;
You and me both. Avoid the machine gunned look.
...............Stape
Thanks again!..
..been appraising my "sky holes"
Post a Comment