![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivHVMkkD9Z2hW65irPe6McoF6QIOVBShspOgD3FtkT2w5K_Bqrd9oWujDc925NNokhJOZkTZC3x3bI84idfzhqOg4Q5EoHPRpiuXGAQB2FqwfnONCJHv_a7nsUy28512f49Rq50Z__oa8/s400/goats.jpg)
I was asked in the comments to explain the terms Luminism and Tonalism. I will begin with the earlier form, luminism (my spell check always suggests Leninism when I write that). Here is a luminist painting below by Martin Johnson Heade.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh6DV0nkffeqdLF28qBBKy8NQZCTFlOdyDzFVlQ6V641dg8x4acavVwfHxEX_hRb2H_HvoGuNfPxyjpF_J3MVfus0veXWrQ9GpXNNeK9Jd2ipFlVSBUkuBYXOhLVibF5pkWGt9nvyOCD6Q/s400/Lake_George_ATC.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEirmRdWUWyMU4rDSAtutTcPhOckKLyE1dHcGDCkwxcga7eTvIHOAFe-pZT_XaBeccZnoaN31T3AAyZJiGHCU3wmSG0prs0-Tjl05yzFyg-e8fBiGyr8kBeC-5fXO_mqVXegJReVJ3z1CnE/s400/Storm_King_on_the_Hudson.jpg)
Below is a tonalist painting by R. Swain Gifford,
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgvuiEQc4JbZ65pSibdDoxpB84IASi3M5j_Zmw-fhwys5q0sF5gp85IRr1r_QdOtjaAszpe5uzt5zohkcL4RXj7RH5uvD749dxcQfn9Ij4H2-5xXEmBGfvZEK_S5PzV45wV7Nn1y0ScZos/s400/R+Swain+Gifford.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj890slL_JKRRUS4fx3lYwf5-QKj_KWNFnMoeM7taxoCLghhvMPNP1oIuK4TCMSHJPJAUPQWbf1sNYnBF5jhMkL3It8X8NqnLaAA3gEAXQkeROLnn9YiTkvQM0kskzWtaoOd0oN31QSI2U/s400/Inness_George_Winter_Morning_Montclair.jpg)
Tonalist paintings are usually shot through with a single pervasive color, of no particular place, have visible and rough brushwork, and are heavily designed or invented rather than made from careful observation of some actual place.
Where luminist painting is often concerned with clarity and infinite detail, tonalism is usually broadly painted and often has lots of murky and mysterious areas.Tonalism is only being rediscovered now, there are few references on the subject and compared to the well known Luminist painters like Fitz H. Lane or Sanford Gifford , artists like Bruce Crane and Henry Ward Ranger are pretty obscure.
I will return to the tonalist painters soon, however in order to do it I am going to have to scan things from my clipping files. There just isn't enough accessible material I can find on the net. See you all tomorrow.
images from artrenewal.org and athenauem.org
10 comments:
Thanks Stape, the chickens isn't that big of a disappointment because my wife's aunt owns a farm and has tons of chickens and she's been hinting that she wants it so I'm sending it to her.
When ever I do a search on tonalism I get mostly Inness results and I love Inness but how do you find these obscure artists out of the same movement? They are interesting enough and yet difficult to find. I've never heard of Bruce Crane and Henry Ward Ranger. The tonalists are my favorite and I want to find more on those artists.
Ah, morning coffee and Stape's latest selections- life is good!
What's so fun about this is you don't know ahead of time what painters he's going to throw at you. A delight to see work from the less well known artists. I am convinced that much of the best stuff often remains unseen or little seen- and often this blog does a little something to help remedy that.
P.S. Those goat look like confirmed Tonalists.
Thanks for the clarification.
Cigar coming your way...
gregoery:
IU think over the nexxt few years books will become available. There is now material on Charles Warren Eaton, and also Dwight Tryon. There is some obscure European stuff on their equivalent movements, which like impressionism became a world movement.
Their is surprisingly little on the net though.
....Stape
Philip:
I expect that there is all kind of great stuff tucked away in the basements of American museums unseen for generations. There will be a great retrospective and return to popularity soon I expect.
....................Stape
Jeremy:
Thank you,I am laying down in the driveway quietly awaiting the delivery of my cigar.
..........Stape
Now R. Swain Gifford I don't know at all. Is he related to Sanford Gifford"
Thanks for taking the time to define the differences. I can usually recognize, to some limited degree anyway, a tonalist painting, and sometimes can even figure out the luminist, but this has been a very helpful description and will provoke further study.
There is so much good art out there, and I have to say that 90% of what I see produced today seems to be thrown together and not composed and orchestrated like these older works. Sort of rushed, and simplified. ( Not yours, of course.)
I may be taking the dog and the truck up north to the White Mtns. for a few days if the weather is good. I might even visit Profile Lake (made even more famous by your recent painting).
"evitest" the most evit ever.
Philip:
I dont believe so.I am certain he is not related to Gifford Beale, am not sure about Kathy Lee..........
..............Stape
Deb;
was there again the other day and as I was leaving another artist I know was coming in with a camera.You may have to have a reservsation'.
...Stape
evitest= cross between effete and elitist,often used to describe academics, celebrity opinionistas, and senators..
Post a Comment